Qual a vantagem de usar o Luma 3DS com relação ao RX?
Estou com o RX, as vezes não carrega o desbloqueio e tenho que reiniciar o portátil.
100% boot success rate. No more Yellow/Orange/Grey/Red screen of death! (As my friend nicknamed the crash screen for MenuHax)
Brick Protection. A9LH loads before the system's code, so if the system is messed up, Decrypt9 can be loaded to restore from a backup.
Upgrade protection. A9LH loads before the system, so it's always running. Luma3DS, the recommended CFW and the one the guide tells you to use, has write-protection on the parts of the 3DS that contain A9LH, and those are loaded first, so Nintendo's updates can't remove A9LH once it is installed.
Therefore, you can update your SysNand to the latest version without worry, and play online without any extra exploits.
No EmuNand needed. Due to the two above points, there is no need to run an EmuNand, and so 1-2GB of space can be freed up on the SD/microSD.
Faster boot. Due to the above, there is no need to boot an EmuNand, and CFW is booted into first, so booting is quicker. (No need to boot twice).
Better battery life. As SysNand is used instead of EmuNand, the system doesn't need to read/write to the SD card as often, and so the battery isn't drained as much.
Install GBA/DSiware games once. With EmuNand, you had to install them to both SysNand and EmuNand. With A9LH, there's only SysNand, so you only need to install them once.
e mais um monte de coisas. Além do rxtools estar bem defasado e ficará mais com o tempo.https://plailect.github.io/Guide/
Edited by El Loco Yoshi, 16 novembro 2016 - 23:48 .